Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Discuss autism diets and biomedical treatments of autism.

Moderator: ModeratorBill

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:36 pm

Goodness, things are really dull when we have to resort to cheer leading for the 8 page scroll. Yawn.

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:55 pm

edit

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

makingitpossible
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:25 am

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby makingitpossible » Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:18 pm


dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:02 pm

Thanks mip... Here is the direct link.

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546443/posey-cspan-72915

If they don't like the research results, they just call a meeting and bring a BIG GARBAGE can and trash the offending documents. This junk science has been what the psycho shills have based their "scientific" opinions on all these years in addition to Simpsonwood and Poul Thorsen, the cesspool of filth and lies is finally exposed as we knew it would. Maybe there is a nearby abortion clinic for the shills to find respectable employment sifting though murdered unborn infant parts and organs. Their dream job.

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Thu Oct 15, 2015 11:01 pm

#CDCwhistleblower march in Atlanta on 10-24 and 10-25

Robert Kennedy, Jr. sent this message to the ‪#‎JusticeOrElse‬ Gathering regarding vaccines that are designed to specifically target Black boys.

Want to get involved? Join thousands in Atlanta, Georgia at the Truth, Transparency and Freedom Rally on October 23-25, 2015. Get information @ http://www.cdctruth.org/

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:35 pm


Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:50 pm

http://truthinmedia.com/truth-in-media- ... documents/

Since 2014, Ben Swann has been investigating and reporting on the story of William Thompson, a CDC scientist who hired a whistleblower attorney and turned over to Congress thousands of pages of documents regarding a 2004 CDC study on autism and vaccines.

Swann reported in September 2014:

“Thompson is a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and has been with the CDC since 1998.

A statement released on August 27th by Dr. Thompson in response to media coverage is that he and co-authors from a 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics did in fact omit important information from a study on the link between vaccines and autism.

While Thompson goes on to explain that he believes that vaccines have saved and continue to save lives, he clearly admits that the CDC did in fact intentionally omit data that demonstrated a connection between an increased risk of autism in African American males who were giving the MMR vaccine before 36 months of age.

Thompson goes on to say that his reason for coming forward was because of conversations with Dr. Brian Hooker over the course of 10 months. Those conversations were about whether or not there is a connection between vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. Thompson clearly states that his hand was forced by Hooker who secretly recorded the conversations.”

[RELATED: Reality Check: CDC Scientist Admits Data of Vaccines and Autism Was Trashed]

Thompson later handed over the study documents to Congressman William Posey. One month ago, Posey’s office went on to give Swann access to these documents. In fact, Swann was the first journalist to receive the documents from Posey’s office.

Upon receiving those documents, Swann organized a team comprised of doctors, journalists, authors and former CDC specialists to analyze every single document that was handed over.

On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 Swann will release a Truth in Media documentary which details a study of CDC cover-up and suppression of medical findings. In addition, Swann will release the Thompson documents at TruthinMedia.com to anyone who wishes to learn more about what’s inside them.

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Sun Mar 20, 2016 2:47 pm

Good news ... a NC Congressman, Mark Meadows (I think that's his name) has backed Bill Posey and is recommending a Congressional hearing for Dr. William Thompson! :D

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:23 pm

Paging Dr. Wakefield: One Of Your Critics Quoted By CBS and FOX Was Named As A Defendant In A Wrongful Death, Fraud Case With $33 Million Conflict Of Interest
April 1, 2016 By Celia Farber 3 Comments

I was going to call it a day, when a piece of particularly distressing Associated Press anti-“Vaxxed” (the movie) propaganda caught my eye–on Fox (Health) News Online and CBS News online.

It managed to be all at once offensive, (actually in a WW2 Holocaust* sense,) self-victimizing, and the kind of yuk-yuk “clever” only the truly humorless could ever embrace. (*Historian Daniel Glass, in Life Unworthy of Life, delineates how the Nazis saw Jews as infectious matter, first, which began the dehumanization.)

The Fox News article featured a photo of Jenny McCarthy, while CBS News used a photo of Robert De Niro.

Propaganda has countless depressant features; One is that all hope of novelty or ingenuity is lost before you even read it. It’s always a sucker punch. Take that. In this case, we the aggrieved nerds at the CDC who resent that anybody in the Western World should begrudge us a fatally corrupted study MMR/Autism that supplied the bedrock of “vaccines-don’t-cause-autism” are here to flog famous people who have “disappointed” us. We all know how Jenny McCarthy was crucified for speaking out on behalf of her vaccine damaged (by her own telling) son, despite the fact that she managed to improve his condition tremendously by way of multiple healing modalities, chiefly gut restoration and diet change.

Despite the fact that the gaspers here are politically correct down to their last atom, they see no reason to hold back on mocking and flogging McCarthy for her beauty. You get the sense they would like to literally stone her if they could. The condescending and wholly unoriginal insult they trot out again and again asks with heavy eye roll who parents would “rather” get pediatric advice from–a medical doctor, or a Playboy Bunny. As if any parent alive ever stood before these two choices. The worst thing is, nobody ever tells these people how banal they are.

My eye caught the other sucker punch quote that has been, insanely, pollinating in the raft of articles hysterically denouncing the explosive documentary nobody has seen yet: Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe, produced by Andrew Wakefield, Del Bigtree, and Polly Tommey. Robert DeNiro, who has seen it, backed it passionately, until suddenly, he pulled the plug, this past Saturday, removing it from Tribeca Film Festival’s schedule... continues at link

http://truthbarrier.com/2016/04/01/pagi ... -interest/

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

Winnie
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Winnie » Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:26 pm

The William Thompson Documents. There’s no whistle to blow.

For those unfamiliar with the story of William Thompson, here’s a brief introduction. William Thompson is a CDC researcher who has worked on vaccine/autism studies. About 2 years ago he approached Brian Hooker (an autism parent and very vocal advocate for the idea that vaccines cause autism) stating that a statistically significant result was not only left out of an old study but that this represented not a scientific decision, but misconduct on the part of the CDC. It is worth noting that “statistically significant” is not the same as “proof of a connection”. Brian Hooker published his own analysis (incorrectly claimed as being the same as the CDC analysis method) in a now retracted paper. The result he presented was that there was an apparent increased risk of autism for one small subset of the study population: African American males, who were vaccinated not on schedule but before age 3.

There are some questions, of course, that this raises. Is this result very strong? Does the lack of inclusion in the paper represent scientific fraud or a legitimate scientific decision?

Full article and links to documents: http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2016/01/04/the-william-thompson-documents-theres-no-whistle-to-blow/
Winnie
"Make it a powerful memory, the happiest you can remember."

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:57 pm

We're not unfamiliar with the story, we can read. It must be slow over on the Left Foot, Right Foot Feet Feet Feet blog. smh We don't need interpretation from another parent who shared his own daughter was injured by vaccines and yet continues to squeal there's no "there" there. We don't need people with personal conflicts of interest to continue to protect billion dollar toxic poison vaccine makers by underscoring Brian Hooker's analysis was retracted because he had a conflict of interest as the parent of a child with autism. If my son was in a "small subset," it's horrible to think anyone would knowingly not care that he was at a higher risk for any reason and make it seem that this is no big deal. Junk science is junk science. First from Poul Thorsen (who has been defended and protected) and now from William Thompson. Informed consent is a human right. And isn't it curious how the benefit of the doubt can be given to these obvious corrupt deceivers and nary a mention of "legitimate scientific decisions" when it comes to Dr Wakefield, who the media, still to this day is "reporting" that his medical license was revoked because his fraudulent paper concluded vaccines cause autism. (Which it never even said, but does not seem to bother those with a conflict of interest peddling toxic vaccines for infants no matter how many they injure and kill).

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

Winnie
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Winnie » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:03 pm

dgdavis64 wrote:We're not unfamiliar with the story, we can read. It must be slow over on the Left Foot, Right Foot Feet Feet Feet blog. smh We don't need interpretation from another parent who shared his own daughter was injured by vaccines and yet continues to squeal there's no "there" there. We don't need people with personal conflicts of interest to continue to protect billion dollar toxic poison vaccine makers by underscoring Brian Hooker's analysis was retracted because he had a conflict of interest as the parent of a child with autism. If my son was in a "small subset," it's horrible to think anyone would knowingly not care that he was at a higher risk for any reason and make it seem that this is no big deal. Junk science is junk science. First from Poul Thorsen (who has been defended and protected) and now from William Thompson. Informed consent is a human right. And isn't it curious how the benefit of the doubt can be given to these obvious corrupt deceivers and nary a mention of "legitimate scientific decisions" when it comes to Dr Wakefield, who the media, still to this day is "reporting" that his medical license was revoked because his fraudulent paper concluded vaccines cause autism. (Which it never even said, but does not seem to bother those with a conflict of interest peddling toxic vaccines for infants no matter how many they injure and kill).


Well Matt Carey wrote the article I linked, and he has a son with autism, not a daughter.

Your children couldn't be in any subset of children receiving the MMR, since neither of them ever received the MMR.

Otherwise your disconnected rant is difficult to follow, as usual.
Winnie
"Make it a powerful memory, the happiest you can remember."

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:35 pm

This is what people with common sense who don't have a personal conflict of interest think about the film VAXXED and the CDC whistleblower situation who have actually seen it ... :D



The controversial doc Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, about the CDC's cover-up of data in a 2004 study that links MMR (Measles-Mumps-Rubella) vaccines to autism, will open your eyes to the corruption of a government agency whose job is to protect public welfare. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the film's director, combines fair and balanced interviews with sources ranging from parents of autistic children who were harmed by MMR vaccines to politicians, doctors and a former pharmaceutical rep along with archival footage of congressional audio recordings of Dr. William Thompson, CDC whistleblower who called Dr. Brian Hooker, a biologist, to confess that the CDC had covered-up and even manipulated crucial data in the 2004 study. Vaxxed does bring up the fact that Dr. Wakefield was accused of fraud in his 1998 report on MMR vaccines and autism, but he was falsely accused. Unless you're made out of stone, you'll find yourself deeply moved by the interviews with the parents of children who have been injured by MMR vaccines and show clear signs of autism. The facts presented will enrage you because they show how the CDC knew that MMR vaccines are linked to autism, but did everything in their power to supress that link. You'll learn that, according to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable for causing harm to consumers injured by MMR vaccines (in other words: you can't sue them), and that when it comes to scientific testing, MMR vaccines aren't tested as rigorously and thoroughly as pharmaceutical drugs. There are no long-term studies that have tested MMR vaccines nor are there any studies that test non-vaccinated children against vaccinated children. Vaxxed shows you in an easy-to-understand way precisely how the CDC covered-up and manipulated the data from the 2004 study, and what makes that data so crucial for the sake of public welfare to begin with. Even more enraging are the revolving doors between government and Big Pharma: Dr. Julie Louise Gerberding, the former director of the CDC during that study, now works for the pharmaceutical company Merck as President of Merck Vaccines. Merck just so happens to have an exclusive license to manufacture MMR vaccines. Make of that what you will. Not surprisingly, Dr. Gerberding declined to be interviewed. Her silence speaks louder than words, though. Big Pharma seems like a pimp while government agencies such as the CDC and even the mainstream media are essentially Big Pharma's unctuous prostitutes. Learning about the CDC's conscious decision to undermine public welfare reminds me of what Hannah Arendt wrote about the banality of evil. Many members of the CDC are merely following orders and don't even consider the option of subversively criticizing the "party line" like Dr. Thompson dared to do so bravely. How is the CDC's cover-up not a crime against humanity? If there were any justice in this world, they would be tried in the Hague. If there were indeed a Nuremberg-like trial for the CDC, it's doubtful that the excuse "I was just following orders" would be accepted. Regardless of where you stand on the issue of vaccines, Vaxxed will ultimately change the way you look at vaccines and the CDC as long as you're a critical thinker who's open to new information and not a "Good German." To be fair, though, the doc doesn't highlight the big difference between adjuvanted vaccines that contain mercury in the form of thimerosol and non-adjuvanted vaccines that don't contain thimerosol, but that's a minor, forgivable issue that can be solved once you do more research and ask questions after watching the film. Prepare to be concurrently enlightened, alarmed and enraged. Instead of seeing vapid junk like Batman v. Superman (which is part of America's "bread and circuses"), see this important exposé and then decide for yourself whether or not it's worth the risk for you and your children to be injected with an MMR vaccine. Cinema Libre Studio opens Vaxxed at the Angelika Film Center.



http://nycmovieguru.com/april1st16.html#vaxxed

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

Winnie
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Winnie » Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:03 pm

dgdavis64 wrote:This is what people with common sense who don't have a personal conflict of interest think about the film VAXXED and the CDC whistleblower situation who have actually seen it ... :D


So of course you know this person 1) has common sense, and 2) has no personal conflict of interest? How do you know this since there is no name or cred listed on such an obviously biased review?

You don't, of course, but if you had bothered to check the source before fabricating your statement, you would have found the name of the reviewer, linking to his article he wrote on the kooky conspiracy site "Natural News."

lol. No bias there! Or common sense for that matter.
Winnie
"Make it a powerful memory, the happiest you can remember."

Mouse
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:46 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Mouse » Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:17 am

Winnie wrote:[b][size=150]
There are some questions, of course, that this raises. Is this result very strong? Does the lack of inclusion in the paper represent scientific fraud or a legitimate scientific decision?

Yes, it's scientific fraud. You should read the whistleblower book. There's plenty of evidence of fraud, fraud doesn't equal causation. However we have a lot of correlation, and CDC conspiracy to hide facts. Most peer reviewed articles claiming that vaccines are safe and effective reference Poul Thorsen who is a science fraud and wanted by the FBI. https://sharylattkisson.com/researcher-who-dispelled-vaccine-autism-link-most-wanted-fugitive/ No one retracted this fugitive's research studies. Once again science fraud and FBI most wanted fugitive doesn't prove causation either. Tobacco science doesn't prove smoking is safe, and CDC science isn't going to prove vaccines are safe either. Not everyone that smokes dies from cancer. I used to smoke, and cancer free here. My father smokes in his late 60s and no cancer there either. My grandfather smoked too; no cancer with him either he died from lung infection.

Most pediatricians and doctors I've spoken with don't deny the autism/vaccine link. They think vaccines are important, and it's the lesser evil. A couple celebrity doctors on TV don't prove vaccines are safe and effective either. You can design a scientific to prove unprotected sex doesn't lead to pregnancy, and that's how these studies are developed. You can prove vaccines don't cause autism if you throw out all the children with autism from the study.

Dr. Frank DeStefano director of immunizations, was recorded admitting that vaccines can cause autism but it's impossible to know which children will be affected.

Mouse
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:46 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Mouse » Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:20 am

People who think vaccines are safe and effective remind me of Dave Chappelle in this skit about R. Kelly.

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/5uemlz/chappelle-s-show-celebrity-trial-jury-selection---uncensored

Winnie
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Winnie » Sat Apr 02, 2016 10:13 am

Mouse wrote:
Winnie wrote:[b][size=150]
There are some questions, of course, that this raises. Is this result very strong? Does the lack of inclusion in the paper represent scientific fraud or a legitimate scientific decision?

Yes, it's scientific fraud. You should read the whistleblower book. There's plenty of evidence of fraud, fraud doesn't equal causation. However we have a lot of correlation, and CDC conspiracy to hide facts. Most peer reviewed articles claiming that vaccines are safe and effective reference Poul Thorsen who is a science fraud and wanted by the FBI.


no, Mouse, that isn't true, and easily checked. In fact your statements concerning Thorsen and research alone are so inaccurate that it's obvious you are just repeating nonsense you read on some conspiracy site.

Thorsen was indicted for embezzlement of CDC funds, not research fraud. The CDC would have to expose Thorsen themselves in order for Thorsen to be investigated and prosecuted. If the CDC is involved in a conspiracy to hide this, obviously the CDC wouldn't be exposing it. like duh.

Not that Thorsen's case has anything to do with Wakefield's case or with the matter at hand.

You need to at least do some basic fact-checking on your own, instead of just repeating junk you find on conspiracy sites.
Winnie
"Make it a powerful memory, the happiest you can remember."

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Sat Apr 02, 2016 2:20 pm

The fact that we have people with personal conflicts of interest still defending Poul Thorsen and the cesspool of corruption at the CDC is what's most concerning. Especially since he stole the money for the "research," so how reliable can this junk science be? Has it been retracted? If the CDC is so forthcoming (how else could Thorsen be reported and prosecuted for his crimes? duh) then his junk science should be retracted. His "research" was used to "debunk" the vaccine/autism link and since this has been called into question, the CDC should have taken steps to rectify this issue. But they haven't. And now that we've known for years this is nothing but junk science, the CDC continues to allow the injury and death of infants proving themselves negligent and corrupt murders.

The entire body of evidence as a whole on toxic vaccines and the blatant corruption of our government certainly is relevant, problem after problem can't be ignored and hidden or lamely explained away as much as the shillville crowd has tried. I can only imagine what other junk science will end up being revealed, this must be the tip of the iceberg.

Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers

Winnie
Posts: 4227
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby Winnie » Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:07 pm

dgdavis64 wrote:The fact that we have people with personal conflicts of interest still defending Poul Thorsen and the cesspool of corruption at the CDC is what's most concerning.


I haven't seen a defense of Poul Thorsen. Can you please provide those facts? Who is defending him, why would the CDC prosecute him if he is important to a cover-up, and what does any of that have to do with Wakefield or Thompson?
Winnie
"Make it a powerful memory, the happiest you can remember."

dgdavis64
Posts: 5241
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Whistleblower Says CDC Knew in 2003 of Higher Autism..

Postby dgdavis64 » Sat Apr 02, 2016 11:02 pm


Beware of the pharma trollbot shills posting from anonymous proxy servers


Return to “Diet and Biomedical Treatments for Autism”